Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


April 8: Council Tax is unfair and unjust

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 April 2009
Our councillors have been running true to form. Despite the fact that people have been losing their jobs or going on to short-term working, they have awarded themselves a large pay rise.
They then went on to contribute to one of the highest council tax rises in the country, accompanied by cuts in services which will cause real hardship.
I am a pensioner now in my 80s. My wife and I both worked for 51 years, in fact my wife still wor
ks part-time. During our working lives we were never on the dole and we never received state benefits of any kind. We both paid into small works pension schemes when we were able to, and thus, we are always just outside the state benefits net. Like many pensioners, we have to pay the full council tax bill.
Every year we get a small rise in the state pension to cover increases in the cost of living. A few days later, the council tax bill drops through the letter box, wiping out our rise, and taking a bit more besides.
How much longer can this totally unfair and unjust situation be allowed to continue? Why should we have to pay the same amount out of our tiny pensions as a household with two or three wage earners?
Margaret Thatcher got a lot of criticism when she introduced the poll tax, but it was in fact, a much fairer tax than the present system, which is based solely on property.
Everyone uses council services and therefore everyone should pay something towards them. Instead, many people pay nothing at all.
This must be the only country in the world which actually rewards people for being totally irresponsible. If you try to stand on your own two feet and help yourself in this country you will be punished for doing so by the Government.
The unfair and unjust council tax must be overturned and replaced by a fairer system which takes into account income and ability to pay.
Fred Middleton,
Grendon Walk, Northampton.

House owners are easy targets
AS a pensioner living alone, with a very limited budget, I was incensed to receive and forced by law to start overall increased payments of 4.3 per cent for council tax, at a time of low inflation/interest rates.
From this month, my annual amount due is £840 (after £240 off for sole occupancy), my biggest budget outlay.
I noted that the "demand" – an appropriate word – advised me that Northamptonshire Police had increased their charge by 4.5 per cent to take their share of the kitty to 13 per cent, whereas Northampton Borough Council only takes two per cent more at 15 per cent for all the services it provides.
So, because I was burgled 15 months ago and no-one bothered to show up after several phone calls or investigated the crime, plus I never see a police officer on my estate, and rarely a PCSO, I took a trip into Northampton town centre last Saturday night, on my free bus pass (one of the few benefits I receive for the charge) to see where the law enforcers are being deployed.
I was astounded to find umpteen coppers, standing in shop doorways, in twos, casually chatting, watching the drunken revellers staggering up and down Bridge Street.
It is high time for a complete rethink on this grossly unfair local tax. It needs to be incorporated into income tax, so that everyone with an income pays their share. The reduced administration costs would be enormous.
Why should I, out of my pittance, subsidise these people, awash with cash, just because I am a house owner, an easy target for collection of this outrageously unjust levy?
It is people who demand council services, not houses. So if all adult residents were compelled to contribute, the police could do the job they are paid for, to protect residents, as well as a cushy few hours in the town centre, every weekend, perhaps then we could rest easy in our beds and get the protection we pay for?
Keith Jackson,
Tavistock Close, Northampton.

Where council's charity cash went
Following the coverage in Monday's Chronicle & Echo regarding funding from Northamptonshire County Council for the Northampton Carnival, I believe it is worth making clear how the strategic funding programme is allocated.
This year we received applications totalling £2.4million for a fund of around £1.4million, so some difficult decisions had to be made. Decisions regarding funding allocations are made by the community funding cabinet committee with advice from the community funding advisory panel which includes members of the voluntary sector.
Examples of funding allocated include:
n Over £43,000 allocated to a range of other cultural projects such as the Northamptonshire Black History Association and Northamptonshire Open Studios and Exhibitions.
n £144,000 has been allocated to various domestic abuse and victim support schemes operating across Northamptonshire.
n Almost £200,000 will be used to help fund schemes aimed at young people.
n Almost £150,000 is being allocated to various schemes aimed at supporting older people and people with physical or learning disabilities.
n A further £212,000 will fund a list of transport initiatives including community minibuses and door-to-door schemes.
n Over £260,000 is being allocated to help fund advice and information services including citizen's advice bureaux.
Although in this funding round a decision was made not to give money to support the carnival, thousands of pounds are being allocated to other worthwhile projects and services that will benefit a lot of people, including some of the county's most vulnerable residents.
Councillor Ursula Jones,
Cabinet member for policy and partnerships, Northamptonshire County Council.
Market move will all end in tears
AS an experienced market trader of many years standing, I am always cynical about what councils and their expensive consultants try to do with our Market Square. It usually ends in tears, as I think the latest market move will do.
I might be wrong, of course, and I would be the first to shake Richard Church's hand if the market was flooded with shoppers coming in to see the events and spending good money on the market. We could certainly do with it. I'll believe it when I see it, like readers will.
Another thing which amazes me is the cry that goes up when it is suggested that bankers should not get high pay and absurdly big bonuses: "Our best talent will go abroad".
What talent are we talking about here, may I ask? The talent that has just got us into this mess?
E Fitzpatrick,
Ridgeway, Northampton.

Life for tenants made harder
April 3 was a sad day in the life of Northampton, although the reason why seems to have gone unnoticed by the media and the majority of the town's population.
This date saw the final closure of the Kingsthorpe and Weston Favell Housing offices and the start of long treks into the town centre for any tenant who wishes to pay rent, ask for repairs or seek advice.
As a borough councillor, I was a shadow chairman of a housing committee and have had many constituents call me on housing issues. At a time of economic downturn, the need for accessible council housing and advice is even more necessary. And yet, in Lib Dem-run Northampton, those in the best place to offer advice and support retreat to the Guildhall.
I know Kingsthorpe well (having been a teacher at Kingsthorpe Upper School) and so am clear that the changes which have been implemented will make the lives of council tenants harder, not easier.
Matthew J May,
Prospective Parliamentary Candidate, South Northants Constituency.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 April 2009 8:08 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Jonathan Cobb,

Kingsthorpe, Northampton 08/04/2009 16:09:08
I am one of the organisers of my local event - the carnival. Now there has been much talk for and against the event and at the end of the day the way I look at this is this event is substancial to the town for its tourism, business and so the rest of the UK can see Northampton in action and put us on the map! With the balloon festival not happening and questions on my event I find it hard to see how we as a town can grow and be known to people in the UK for having a great place to live. We should all be proud of our history, culture and where we live as I am the carnival has great history we all know that even reading this you must agree and we need to preserve it so having our carnival is part of that but £50,000 is not a huge amount of money admit it, compared to over budget events like our olympics, sports events etc and you have to agree. Support your town as the local government don't want to. The hard thing is you can do petitions, complain to higher government, write letters and have meetings but it never changes the outcomes in the end its sad to see. Does anyone agree?
2

mack69,

Northampton 11/04/2009 22:07:30
Why does the Carnival have to cost £50,000 to run thought the people taking part used it as a fun day
If its for police cover we are already paying through the nose for this service and people would welcome seeing a policeman on our streets instead of hiding away at Weston Favell and Mere way
3

Mickthewelder,

Northampton 14/04/2009 15:32:51
I needed some large and heavy household material disposed of. I called the relevant Council Department and I was told £25.00 for 3 items. OK that equates to 25% of my state pension plus the £35.00 Council Tax I pay and I was willing to pay. I filled the form out online and indicated the 3 items one of which was a single bed consisting of a headboard, base and mattress. I was contacted by the Council and told the bed was counted as 3 items so the total would be £50.00. That's a little stiff so I enquired about an alternative method. I was advised to take it to the tip or try the Yellow Pages. If I was able to take it to the tip I would not be asking them to do it.
I suggested that I should possibly wait until the arrival of an itinerant group and as they are leaving gingerly add my 3 piece bed to their unwanted remnants and I am sure it would be collected without any argument about a bed being a bed or 3 distinct items. Surely this would not be construed as fly tipping as if our out of town guests can leave their calling card whats a 3 piece bed among tax paying friends.
Logic does not seem to be a strong point at the Council Offices. Mickthewelder
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.