Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Best ban: Saints launch appeal against 18-week punishment



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 October 2008
Northampton Saints have lodged an appeal against Neil Best's 18-week ban for eye-gouging.
They told they RFU today they wanted to look again at the ban imposed on Best for illegally making contact with the eye or eye area of London Wasps' James Haskell with his hand during the Guinness Premiership match on September 20.

The appeal will be heard by a RFU panel on Monday in London.

Best, who cannot be selected by Saints until the final determination of the appeal, will miss eight rounds of Premiership action, plus all of Northampton's European Challenge Cup and EDF Energy Cup pool matches and Ireland's autumn schedule under the current ban.

He had been called before the panel by Premiership citing officer Ken Pattinson following Saints' 24-20 victory over Wasps at Franklin's Gardens.

Haskell gave evidence before the panel, confirming his written statement made after the game that the player "gratuitously commenced to gouge at (his) eye with increasing intensity".

The Wasps man, a contender to captain England in their autumn Tests next month, said his vision became increasingly blurred, he suffered excruciating pain and felt physically sick because of soreness.

He was later taken to Northampton General Hospital, where an ophthalmologist diagnosed a corneal abrasion and prescribed antibiotic drops.

Photographs taken a day after the game showed significant swelling around Haskell's eye, which was closed and bruised, with a one-centimetre scratch on his upper eyelid.

Best, whose Saints team-mate Dylan Hartley received a six-month suspension for eye-gouging last year, told the panel he had acted recklessly, and not deliberately.

The panel said it accepted Best had not intentionally searched for Haskell's eye and did not intend to inflict serious injury, but he had tried to grab somewhere on his head to pull him up and backwards.

But they did not agree with Best's account that contact with the eye was "fleeting".

Best, 29, joined Northampton from Ulster this summer. During a professional career of more than 150 games he had never previously been cited.

In their written judgement, the panel said: "The nature of the player's actions was grave.

"Placing fingers in and around opponents' eyes constitutes one of the most serious offences in the game because of the risk of permanent, career-ending damage.

"Contact was clearly painful and caused significant injury, continuing distress and some mental anguish to Haskell, who initially feared first for his sight and subsequently that he may not be able to play again."

After imposing an 18-week ban, the panel added: "In reaching this conclusion, the panel has taken into consideration the fact that this offence was entirely out of character and will be a significant blemish on his record.

"We also took into account the damaging effect this will have on the player's club and international playing career, and the risk that he will suffer financial loss.

"The panel is satisfied that this is commensurate and proportionate with the seriousness of the offence."


The full article contains 507 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 October 2008 4:30 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

im-a,

Northampton 01/10/2008 12:00:00
How comes this player is not branded a "thug" if it was a football player it would be all over the papers and the rugbyfans will be moaning how thugish football is, yet when it is there sport, rugby they laugh it of and say it part of the game?
2

St Lytham,

The Beach 01/10/2008 14:14:55
As the result of the hearing has just been published it is now "all over the papers". That's how "im-a" has managed to read about it no doubt!
Most of the players in football and rugby are not "thugish" but there are some who are as indeed there are among the supporters. No one laughs this kind of punishment off and the repercussions for the club are worrying. The important thing is that the incident was reported and looked at after the event and was dealt with by a severe ban and not simply a fine as may happen in other sports. I am not aware of similar punishments being handed out in other professional sports. I'd still rather bring my children to watch rugby than football as the action is on the pitch. The supporters do not use foul language and are by and large courteous and well behaved. Locally the Saints and the Cricket Club do not look for public handouts to run their business affairs but the same can not be said of the local football team-unless of course you you go to MK where the owner of the football business is putting his money into the club and getting on with it.
3

desktop,

01/10/2008 19:38:51
Will he paid whilst he is banned ?
4

im-a,

Northampton 02/10/2008 16:31:19
St Lytham how can you say its all over the papers? I bought the sun today and there was a very small paragraph on this story. Another note aswell on your comment about "I'd still rather bring my children to watch rugby than football as the action is on the pitch," I have been going to watch the cobblers since I was 3, I am now 16 and a season ticket holder and i have NEVER been involved or witnessed football violence, sure there is the singing and banter between the fans but this in turn creates a great atmosphere unlike the dull atmosphere when watching rugby. I have watched the saints several times
and in my opinion there is NO atmosphere. Surely a great atmosphere can only encourage your team to victory and we should remember this is what its all about.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.