Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Turbine campaigners in Northampton win temporary reprieve



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 June 2008
Campaigners fighting plans to build a massive wind turbine on the edge of Northampton have won a temporary reprieve.
Supermarket giant Asda has applied to build a 417ft turbine in the car park of its distribution centre in Brackmills.

The company has said the £2 million turbine would generate enough electricity to power 1,250 homes and prevent the release of mor
e than 5,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

But people living in nearby Great Houghton have argued the structure, which would be the same height as the Express Lift Tower, would be a blot on the landscape.

And last night, their campaign was given a boost when a public footpath, which the West Northamptonshire Development Corporation (WNDC) had been unaware of, was discovered close to the proposed turbine site.

After being told about the path's existence by members of the public, the WNDC's planning committee refused to make a decision on the scheme until the turbine's impact on those using the route had been investigated.

The chairman of Great Houghton Parish Council, Tony Skirrow, welcomed the delay.

He said: "I don't honestly know what will happen now, but we're very pleased it's been delayed."

Earlier in the evening, objectors had told members of the WNDC the turbine would have a serious impact on the area.

Councillor Michael Hill (Con, Nene Valley) said: "If this was approved it would alter the whole town for the next 50 years. It's a building the same height as the lift tower and it's extremely unusual, if not unique, to allow a wind turbine of that size to be built in an urban area."

The committee was told 111 letters of objection had been received about the plans compared to none in favour.

But Mark Hawkin, from Asda, said many people's concerns were unfounded. He said: "The bulk of concerns aren't valid. There are a lot of rumours and a lot of myths around turbines."

He also said the company would work to screen the turbine, but added much of the structure would not be seen as it would be built in a dip.
He also added the turbine could be used as an educational tool for nearby schools and colleges.

The WNDC will make a decision on the scheme later in the year.



The full article contains 387 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 June 2008 8:59 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Fullingdale,

04/06/2008 10:41:26
If the turbine would be as tall as the lift tower (420 feet), I wonder just how the developers feel that they would screen it?

111 letters of object and none in favour? (A) this is the first that I've heard of this so have had no previous opportunity to give my comments and (B) how many favourable letters did they expect? ... I just can't imagine anyone writing a letter that goes along the lines of "Dear Turbine Committee ... what a great idea!" ... perhaps we could express the objections in terms of the town population* and see what the 111 looks like?

200,000 people offered NO objections!

*population taken from Wiki
2

Matthew in Duston,

Northampton 04/06/2008 22:50:02
Fullingdale, I agree about the screening. The dip that Mark Hawkin refers to would have to be of epic proportions if it is to hide 'much of the structure'!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.