Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Protest continues over Darwin exhibition

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 August 2008
A protest, supporting rational thinking against attacks by religious fundamentalists, will take place outside a Northampton museum.
The protest is in response to part of a display on evolution being censored following a complaint to Abington Park Museum.

A passage in a display on Charles Darwin at the Northampton Borough Council-run museum was covered up after a complaint from
a Christian. The move has now sparked the Northampton Socialist Forum to decide to hold the protest tomorrow.

As reported in the Chronicle & Echo on Thursday, four lines of text were obscured.

The information in the display explained how Charles Darwin used fossils to formulate his theory of evolution, which the forum said was "established scientific fact".

Patrick Markey, of the forum, said: "People are entitled to have all sorts of ideas, but no right to impose them on others.

"This is a public museum and should respect rational scientific thought, not the ideas of some religious fundamentalists."

But Lewis Houston, who raised the issue some years ago with the museum, told the Chronicle & Echo that the issue of creationism versus evolution was not the basis of his query. Rather, he said, it was the accuracy of the text.

The National Secular Society has written to the borough council.

Society president Terry Sanderson said: "There is a global push by the so-called 'creationist movement' to undermine the theory of evolution. It is incumbent on all educators to resist this attempt to deny evidence and, in the process, retard science and progress.

"Visitors to the museum are entitled to a better explanation of Darwin's world-shaping idea than the bowdlerised version you have on display at present."

Councillor Brendan Glynane, the cabinet member for museums said: "There was absolutely no attempt at censorship. The text contains a factual error which could cause confusion.

"It is disappointing to see that some groups have tried to use this error to further their own agenda and make proverbial mountains out of molehills.

"We have now uncovered the display board and are in the process of getting a new board produced."

The text has been uncovered and a new board is being made.

The council says the revised wording will read: "He used the same layers of fossils to show the slow changes that are taking place over the millennia of earth history, each small change enabling a species to adapt to the rigours of its environment – the struggle for survival, through the natural selection, leading to the survival of the fittest."

The council says it will not take up the National Secular Society's offer to pay for the replacement.

n Lewis Houston's letter, page 10.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 August 2008 6:51 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Norman Adams,

Northampton 30/08/2008 10:38:53
Councillor Brendan Glynane, the cabinet member for museums said:

"It is disappointing to see that some groups have tried to use this error to further their own agenda and make proverbial mountains out of molehills.

Mr Glynane – most people should remember is an expert at mountains, molehills and bunds – he was not elected to move mountains – but I feel sure the people of Delapre Ward would remember some reference to the removal of a certain bund?
2

Norman Adams,

Northampton 30/08/2008 11:03:24
Councillor Brendan Glynane, the cabinet member for museums said:

"It is disappointing to see that some groups have tried to use this error to further their own agenda and make proverbial mountains out of molehills.

Mr Glynane – most people should remember is an expert at mountains, molehills and bunds – he was not elected to move mountains – but I feel sure the people of Delapre Ward would remember some reference to the removal of a certain bund?
3

lil,

Delapre 30/08/2008 15:21:21
Everyone has a right to an opinion after all this is a free country isn't it? And parts of the exhibition should not have been censored/removed it's the minority ruling the majority again.

As for the Bund Mr. Adams - we live in hope that Brendan (and others) are true to there word that the Bund will come out. We are sick of listening to the excuses as to why it still remains. Promises, Promises. Trouble is we have good memories.
4

SourSprout,

UK 30/08/2008 22:25:32
Simply replacing the word "evolution" with the phrase "natural selection" on the original board would have sufficed. Unfortunately, the use of the phrase "survival of the fittest" on the replacement board is not accurate either. It was originally coined by the economist Herbert Spencer, although Darwin subsequently used it synonymously with "natural selection".

It's important to be accurate in these matters, otherwise we're no better than those religious nutcases who think that the world is only 6000 years old and that every single species of animal, insect and bird was saved from extinction on a small boat.
5

Diane Northampton,

03/09/2008 15:19:06
Well said Norman Adams on the subject of the bund,Councillor Glynane has gone all quiet on the subject of the bund,despite being reminded on many occasions.He and the other muppets are too busy planning on how to put the final nail in the coffin for the market square and other parts of the town centre!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.