Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Northampton Chron & Echo site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Parking charge plan back on the agenda



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 May 2008
Plans to sharply increase the cost of on-street parking for thousands of householders have been put back on Northamptonshire County Council's agenda.
Earlier this year, the authority announced it was planning to increase residents' parking permits in Northampton from £25 to £40, as part of a controversial overhaul of charges in and around the town centre.

The proposed shake-up was delayed by co
unty councillors last month after reports in the Chronicle & Echo prompted protests over a lack of public consultation.

A final decision will now be made in June after people affected by the plans have been given the chance to have their say.

Councillor Bob Seery (Con, Thrapston), the council's cabinet member for roads and transport, said: "I have arranged for this matter to be fully reviewed and for more effective, meaningful consultations to be carried out before a formal decision is made."

As well as the increase in the cost of residents' parking permits in Spring Boroughs, St James, Billing Road and Alcombe Road in The Mounts, the county council has proposed scrapping free visitors' passes in favour of vouchers costing £10 for a book of 50.

The plans also include increasing the cost of business permits from £250 to £350 and a 25 per cent rise in the cost of on-street parking for shoppers in the town centre.

Councillor Seery said an overhaul of parking charges was overdue because they had remained at the same levels since 2001.

But he was forced to delay their implementation, originally planned for May 5, because the public had not been given enough advance warning.

During a cabinet meeting last month, he admitted: "We have certainly not communicated this matter very well. We need to slow down the process to ensure it is done properly and the right decision is reached."

Independent borough councillor Tony Clarke, whose Castle Ward includes The Mounts, where the permit charges are being increased, said he welcomed the consultation.

But he added: "Before even thinking about raising charges, the county council has to look at residents' current complaints, such as lack of parking and overzealous ticketing.

"Residents do not get value for money at the current rate, so if there is to be an increase, it would have to be matched by action to improve the scheme overall."

Comments on the plans can be made to Rachel Evans at the county council on revans@northamptonshire.gov.uk, or by calling Northampton 236236.

The matter will be discussed at the council's parking committee meeting on Thursday, May 22.



The full article contains 431 words and appears in Northampton Chron & Echo newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2008 9:19 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Paul CD,

Rushden 12/05/2008 14:35:23
One is curious just how many of the councillor's actually live in the areas concerned, and why are they having to pay anything anyway for roads which are paid for from the road licence fund. Councillor Seery says that a "review was overdue anyway" why? have the roads been maintained to a higher quality than around the rest of ramshackle Northampton? Maybe they are patroled by better policing? I very much doubt anything has changed since 2001 apart from poorer maintenance so why do they need to be reviewed. Surely someone in these areas can organise a protest at the council meeting, then remember those who voted for an increase and don't vote for them next time; they will most sorely miss having their noses in the expenses trough.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.