Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


One year cut from attacker's sentence

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 November 2009
A teenage thug locked up for breaking his anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) had his sentence cut by a third at the Court of Appeal.
Kane Johnston, 18, was given three years at Northampton Crown Court in June after he admitted assault, obstructing a constable, threatening behaviour and two ASBO breaches.

But following an appeal, three judges granted Johnston, of Rothersthorpe Road, Briar Hill, a one-year reduction in his "excessive" sentence.

Johnston was locked up after attacking a man during an argument in St John's Street, Northampton, in the early hours of February 14.

Steven Deakin had been part of a group who were arguing when Johnston turned up in a Vauxhall Corsa and got involved, knocking Mr Deakin momentarily unconscious with a punch to the face.

Two months later, he was at a birthday house party on April 5 in Arrowhead Road, Briar Hill, when police were called to arrest one of the party-goers for an unrelated offence.

Johnston, who was drunk, swore at and threatened the officers as they tried to enter.

He was heard shouting: "Get off my estate, you're going to get it and I'll glass you in the eye and you'll know about it."

Johnston later admitted being "cheeky" and swearing at the police, but denied attempting to stop them trying to arrest the suspect. Despite his young age, he already has a string of convictions for violence and offensive behaviour.

Judge Richard Bray, who sentenced him in June to two consecutive 18-month sentences, said: "A seriously aggravating feature of this case is your numerous previous convictions for assault, possessing offensive weapons, three offences of robbery, witness intimidation grievous bodily harm, wounding and assault."

But at the Court of Appeal yesterday, Lord Justice Scott Baker reduced the three-year sentence saying it was excessive. He added: "In our judgment, consecutive sentences were called for, but the sentence of three years in total is manifestly excessive."

Johnston is still subject to a new five-year ASBO banning him from causing alarm, harassment or distress and from drinking alcohol in public unless in licensed premises.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 November 2009 10:22 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
2
1

the ferrett,

12/11/2009 10:40:13
WHY?
2

the ferrett,

12/11/2009 10:40:59
SHOULD BE LOCKED UP LONGER
3

Joe Joyce,

Northampton 12/11/2009 11:41:25
Does anybody in the legal system live in the real world ?????
4

spj,

northampton 12/11/2009 12:15:18
these appeal judges should be made to live in an inner city esate for six months - then they would do thier job properly in the real world
5

the ferrett,

12/11/2009 12:33:08
he will only serve 12 months if that
6

andrewjohnb,

THAILAND 12/11/2009 12:37:48
Come on it`s not rocket science!you have to increase prison sentences for crime not decrease sentences if there is going to be any reduction in crime figures.the scum element of this country must be laughing there socks off at the lenient British Law system.Who says "crime does`nt pay"?
7

mojo,

northampton 12/11/2009 14:17:46
Maybe he will have learned from his previous mistakes and if not he will probably end up inside for longer next time. Some people are just their own worst enemies this young man needs to grow up.
8

michael smith,

12/11/2009 17:02:51
So...
assault, obstructing a constable, threatening behaviour and two ASBO breaches....isn't excessive criminal behavior?.WHO'S PAYING WHO?.
9

elf garnett,

eastfield 12/11/2009 17:03:13
When you get the chance vote for the party that believes punishment deters.
10

busyboy,

northampton 12/11/2009 18:01:05
scott baker you blonker. sack him now law and order what a joke,mind you them mps get away with murder.lol
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.