Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Museum in censorship row over Darwin sign



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 August 2008
Censorship of an exhibition on evolution at a Northampton museum has led to claims organisers are pandering to Christian fundamentalist sensibilities.
An information sign, which is part of Abington Park Museum's display about Charles Darwin and fossils, was covered up after a visitor's complaint.

Two parts of the sign, concerning 'Changing Attitudes to Evolution', are obscured with black paper, but only four lines of text are actually covered over.

It details how Charles Darwin used the study of fossils to help formulate his theory of evolution, set out in On the Origin of Species, which angered fundamental Christians and Creationists.

But following a complaint to the museum, part of the sign was covered over to avoid giving offence and to conceal the poor prose.

The Chronicle & Echo was contacted by the Chapman family after a bank holiday visit to the museum, run by Northampton Borough Council.
Andy Chapman, of Ecton Brook, said: "The text was obscured without any explanation as to why.

"Our suspicions were confirmed by staff, who told us that following a complaint from a single religious fundamentalist, the museum had been instructed to cover up the offending statement.

"By this action the council would appear to be endorsing the views of a religious minority, and denying the right of the rest of us to see the results of rational and scientific thought.

"Evolution is not an extreme view not to be mentioned in respectable
ociety, it is part of mainstream science.

"It's particularly sad that in the 21st century we appear to have a council with 19th-century attitudes.

"I'd be interested to hear how the council justifies this censorship, and who ordered the cover up.

"Preferably, they should reinstate the complete panel immediately.

If they haven't got the courage to do this they should at least put up a statement telling all that they have a policy of allowing censorship by religious minorities."

A spokesman for Northampton Borough Council said the sign was covered up due to the original complaint and also because of its poor syntax.

"Our museum team covered part of a display board following a complaint about a small section of the wording.

"The team agreed the wording was poorly worded and could cause offence. We took the decision to obscure part of it rather than spend tax payers' money on a replacement."

Third paragraph that is causing all the fuss
Charles Darwin

It is the third paragraph which Northampton Borough Council says could cause offence, and so it was covered over.

'In early Victorian times, most geologists still accepted the biblical view of evolution. They saw the different layers of fossil-rich rocks as telling the story of successive waves of creation, each one being obliterated by a deluge.

'The young scientist Charles Darwin (right) was already beginning to question this view, but it was another 30 years before he had painstakingly put together the vast assemblage of facts and observations that enabled him to write On the Origin of Species.

'He used the same layers of fossils that had supported the Genesis view of evolution to show the slow changes that are taking place over the millennia of earth history, each small change enabling a species to the rigours of it's (sic) environment – the struggle for survival through natural selection leading to the survival of the fittest.

The full article contains 561 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 August 2008 11:27 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
2
1

,

28/08/2008 12:35:10
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

irishpawel,

28/08/2008 13:20:43
What are you talking about girlracer? By the sounds of it it was a Christian funda"mentalist" who complained. As usual, intolerant half-wits can't wait to blame Muslims.
3

,

28/08/2008 14:26:04
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

Good Time Gal,

Looking through the Book of Revelations 28/08/2008 14:31:17
And in the beginning God made the Eastern District, Kings Heath and Dallington and saw that it was a complete failure and thenceforth on allowed humans to get on with it as best they could.
5

Blackjohn,

Evolving as we speak 28/08/2008 15:22:32
There are truly some vary scary people about, obviously it's a Christian thing to get all huffy over evolution, to bring muslims in to things shows about as much sense as those god fearing creationalists have shown.

Good Time Gal I think I may be falling for you ;)
6

Good Time Gal,

Waiting for a sign. 28/08/2008 16:15:09
Blackjohn,

Check out the Scopes 'monkey trial' in Tennessee in 1925.

You will then see the kind of nutters that we are dealing with here.

The scary thing is that many of them, including I suspect Dubya, are in positions of great power in the US.
7

Fullingdale,

Northampton 28/08/2008 16:17:34
I bet that the earlier comment stems from someone who didn't read the article carefully and saw MUSEUM to read MUSLIM.

Perish the thought that we should listen to a FUNDAMENTAL CARTOONIST!!!

Hey, how long has the notice been on display?

I like the comment that they covered it up rather than waste tax-payers money ... (a) how much would it cost to have it re-typed? and (b) how come this would be a waste of money, but erecting a pile of scaffolding near the Bedford Road and calling it art, isn't?
8

Tilley,

Northampton 28/08/2008 17:29:16
This is disgusting. The theory of evolution is one of the most well supported scientific theories in the history of science. This in the town that produced Francis Crick, the council should be ashamed.
9

Good Time Gal,

Just wondering... 28/08/2008 17:32:09
...why it is that not all stories permit the addition of comments.

It does not require a great deal of imagination to envisage what type of stories they might be.
10

Mark Allen,

29/08/2008 05:28:24
This is the sort of attitude you'd expect in the middle of the bible belt in the USA, or in a remote backwater half way up a mountain in Pakistan. That the council should pander to such mediaeval views in Northampton is truly disgusting.

From now on will the council be forcing all those churches, which have those nauseatingly pious billboards outside them, to cover up their drivel, which I find deeply offensive to reality?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.