Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drunk man beaten in street for just £5



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
The drunk victim of a robbery in Northampton town centre fell over more than 15 times before he was mugged of his wallet containing just £5.
Martin Keenan, aged 21, was locked up indefinitely for the public's protection after he admitted the robbery of Andrew Jones, committed right under town centre CCTV cameras.

Northampton Crown Court was yesterday shown footage from CCTV cameras in
Abington Street from 11pm on Tuesday, June 3, showing an intoxicated Mr Jones repeatedly falling over.

He was seen taking over 35 minutes to stagger 100 yards down the street before Keenan approached him and tried to help him up.

But while Mr Jones continued to lie on the ground near to the entrance of Peacock Place, Keenan decided to carry out a robbery instead.

The CCTV film showed Mr Jones being punched three times in the face, causing a broken nose before Keenan walked off up Wellington Street with his wallet.

Judge Peter Morrell said he was passing an indeterminate sentence for public protection as it was Keenan's fifth robbery conviction and he had a history of targeting vulnerable victims.

He said: "I am quite satisfied the criteria for dangerousness is met in this case.

"There is a real risk of serious harm to members of the public being caused by further offending in the future of offences of this nature.

"You will be detained in prison until such time the parole board are satisfied you no longer represent a serious risk of harm to the public."

Keenan, of no fixed address, who previously admitted robbery, was told he would have received a four-year prison sentence but due to being assessed as a dangerous offender, Judge Morrell said he would now serve a minimum of two years and would only be released once it is decided safe to do so.

Upon his release from prison, Keenan will also be on licence, and liable for recall to prison, for a decade and would be on licence for life if he re-offends.

Stephen Crouch, defending, said Keenan started drinking heavily upon the death of his mother, who was his only close relative, and came from a very troubled background.

He added: "He is somebody who is still only 21 and not so hopeless that he can be sent to prison for such a long time that he would lose all hope.

"This is a young man who needs a great deal of help."



The full article contains 416 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 September 2008 9:02 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Diane Northampton,

06/09/2008 08:24:15
So the CCTV operators watched for 35 minutes,this man staggering down the street and didn't do anything until he was a victim of crime! I thought it was a crime to be drunk and disorderley in public,but then he would have been mugged of £80.00,on the spot fine!!
2

Lotte,

The Mounts 06/09/2008 09:45:48
I totally agree Diane, I was just thinking that myself. Also I found the line at the bottom about "coming from a very troubled background" very amusing really! There are alot of people that could go round doing this because of their background...but they don't. Please! this is not really a an excuse to attack a helpless man in the street.
3

Stan the dalek,

06/09/2008 11:13:00
Diane, Lotte...tell where it says he was disorderly in that report, because I can't see it. Incapable maybe, but not disorderly.
4

Diane Northampton,

06/09/2008 14:07:30
Okay 'stan the dalek',it may not state 'disorderly'but it was stated he was 'staggering' and right or wrong he could have been charged for being drunk in a public place,especially if he had been causing any trouble,but he was the victim of crime here with the CCTV operators watching him.You are missing the point that these cameras have us believe they prevent crime,when in this instance they did not!!
5

BillingGuy,

06/09/2008 21:44:39
Even if he was not being a nuisance, considering the state he was in they should have sent the police or support officers to check him out and get him in a taxi or something. A number of things could have happened to him such as collapsing and chocking on his own vomit or staggering into the path of a cra (I know he was on Abington street but he could have continued to a busy road).

I bet the CCTV operators were having a good chuckle wathcing him staggering along until it got more serious!
6

Roger Mellie,

Northampton 06/09/2008 22:23:33
Naturally, it's a deplorable incident and the scumbag deserved a spell in the chokey for it.

However, one must ask what one expects to happen when one voluntarily renders oneself insensible and helpless through drink, and then decides to stagger around the centre of a town which has twice the national average rate for violent crime?
7

GRUMPY OF NORTHAMPTON,

NORTHAMPTON 07/09/2008 12:04:57
Spot on Roger, mind you I'm old enough to remember when people would help somebody in this state to get home safely. but now of course we have become such a selfish and greedy race we just see them as another 'easy picking'.

We had kids from broken homes and troubled backgrounds years ago, but they didn't turn into thge mindless thugs that they do now. Maybe its because what limited parenting they were getting was actually aimed at helping them improve their lives whereas now it seems to be aimed at gragging them down to the lowest levels in society.
8

Diane Northampton,

07/09/2008 18:45:18
This is true on people who have had a lot of drink, they become vulnerable and helpless.I worry about my son and daughter who go into town at the weekends,who are not violent sober,and certainly not when they have had alcohol and this is the trouble your reactions are not as good as they would be sober.This is why I feel that the CCTV operators could have done more before that scum bag attacked him,but watched and waited until something serious happened to him before they acted.SHAME ON THEM!!
9

Blackjohn,

Loving the CCTV 08/09/2008 12:20:12
So the CCTV operator calls in a Paramedic or Policeman (there's no one else to call) and everyone moans that this is a waste of public money, the CCTv operators keep an eye on him and they are to blame. Sometimes stuff happens and you can't blame anyone other than those involved.
10

BALLOONS,

northampton 09/09/2008 15:53:06
i see the report about the attack on 2 police officers has been removed again by the censor cops, it was the leading story , what a rag this paper is. read on the www about it soon! wonder if p.m brown got the original version or what is coming up now.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.