Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 18th March 2010

Calls for Tony Woods to pay £3,600 Astragate bill

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 February 2010
Campaigners say the former leader of Northampton Borough Council should repay the cost of an investigation into his behaviour.
In October, Councillor Tony Woods (Lib Dem, Boughton Green) was ordered to make a public apology following an investigation into his decision to leave his untaxed Vauxhall Astra in the Guildhall's underground car park for more than three months.

T
he former leader resigned from his position shortly after the hearing, labelling the so-called Astragate affair "nine months of hell".

But now, political campaigners have used the Freedom of Information Act to find out the investigation into Councillor Woods' behaviour cost £3,594.

Sheltered housing campaigner, Teddy McNabb, who uncovered the figure, said the councillor should now repay the balance.

He said: "Why should the public pay for the serious mistakes and misjudgements of elected politicians? All he ever had to do was do the sensible thing and move the car."

The leader of the opposition at the Guildhall, Councillor David Palethorpe (Con, Billing) agreed the matter should never have reached the point where an investigation was needed.

He said: "It's staggering something so pointless, and entirely avoidable, should have cost the tax payer so much money. The Astragate scandal was a very costly embarrassment for the Liberal Democrats."

But Councillor Woods condemned attempts to drag out of the affair.

He said: "Everyone knows the matter was blown out of all proportion for political purposes. It was a waste of public money, time and effort over an issue where I had publicly apologised and, even my opponents admitted, there was absolutely no dishonesty.

"Now people are wasting yet more time and council resources putting in freedom of information requests. I have stepped down as leader of the council. The case is closed."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 February 2010 11:59 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5
1

miketow,

Towcester 09/02/2010 12:33:26
PerhapsTony Woods could pay the £3600 then put it on his councillor's expenses. Alternatively there must be some sort of financial assistance for councillors in reduced circumstaces who cannot afford parking costs. The best remedy as used in the real world - sack him.
2

Very disgruntled voter,

09/02/2010 12:37:50
Not again.

Will councillors please get on with improving Northampton and stop wasting time on irrelevant trivia.

We don't care about some silly car parking. We do care about our failing town, unemployment, crime, dirt, closing shops,poor services, lack of youth opportunity, council and police services ranked poorly etc etc etc.

When they have improved our councils to four star standards then they can play with trivia. Until then please do the important things.
3

Vesinghoorbe,

The Real World 09/02/2010 13:19:36
Well said VDV.

Enough is enough. Stop raking all this up again and get on with what actually matters - making Northampton a decent place to live in again.
4

Spirit Horse,

09/02/2010 13:20:12


Here is the facts which cllr.woods recieves from the public purse your money , the peoples money and mine.
1] WNDC [ and unelected & unaccountable quango]£12,000
2] As leader ................................ 23,000
3] As a councilor.................just under 7,000
4] As now chair of the audit committee.........4,000

At the time of the misconduct a grand total of £35,000
now a grand total of £23,000
How many hard working joe & jill public, have Free parking for months ?[ cllr.woods has financially gained from his misconduct by this "freebie" parking]. How many elderly/disabled have free parking?. How many of of us all demand he pay????

As for his quite evidently flawed judgement and in my opinion arrogance , this must surely apply to the flawed judgement of his colleagues who made him chair of the Audit committee, its rather like putting the japanese in charge of "save the whale"

During my time campaigning on behalf of my elders and betters to whom i owe a debt that cant be paid, the byword for N.B.C i have encountered from the public is "arrogant".

Be rest assured, this is merely the flake of the iceberg that is heading straight for the Guildhall, and when [ as it will] it smashes into the guildhall, the "words", "deeds" and "attitudes" of N.B.C, will not only be in the public domain of the good people of northampton but the country as a whole and beyond. The cause of this iceberg is called "outrage warming!" teddy mcnabb
5

MichaelKeith,

Northampton 09/02/2010 13:22:42
Well said, Very disgruntled voter.

Let us all try to get on with each other to make the town a better place.

In my opinion - so long as this kind of thing never happens again then the original cost is a price well worth paying.
6

Spirit Horse,

09/02/2010 13:26:49
VDV, with respect i refer you to your comment no.21, in respect of "expenses report an injustice m.p., it appears your tune has changed.
7

MichaelKeith,

Northampton 09/02/2010 13:36:13
Spirit-If your figures are true and I have no reason to doubt that they are not true, then I think it is a disgrace that someone can rake in money in such a way.

But, who voted the guy into position in the first place? Joe Public did!

Who voted for those who placed him on the Audit Commission? Joe Public did!

So who is therefore ultimately to blame for all of this? Joe Public is!

And what should Joe Public do next time around? Vote them all out. And it wouldn't cost the tax payer a penny more!
8

,

09/02/2010 13:40:30
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
9

MichaelKeith,

Northampton 09/02/2010 13:49:05
Spirit, you are not wrong, but the councillor are elected by the people and they could easily become unelected next time around.

Could an argument be made that the car park in question is not open to the general public and the bye laws relating to public car parks may not apply in this case, but be at the discretion of the councillors themselves?
10

Spirit Horse,

09/02/2010 13:54:49
Michael keith, cllr. a woods was repeatedly warned to remove the offending vehicle, he chose to ignore this, so when he states about "his 9 months of hell" its self-inflicted, he then goes on here to state about a waste of borough council resources, rather rich doesnt one think , considering he is the one who has caused the waste! As for the use of the Freedom of Information as one who claims to be a democrat [ but quite happy to sit on a "selected" quango] he should embrace freedom, but then again the liberal/democrats have at present a great deal to fear from the FOI.
Prev
1
2 3 4 5

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.