Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Northampton Chron & Echo site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Blow for ASDA as turbine is refused



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 July 2008
Supermarket giant ASDA has been told it cannot build a wind turbine the size of Northampton's lift tower at a warehouse after residents raised concerns about the scheme's safety.
The firm applied to the West Northamptonshire Development Corporation to build a 417ft turbine in the car park of its distribution centre in Brackmills.

It said the £2m structure would generate enough electricity to power 1,250 homes and prevent the release of 5,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

But members of the WNDC's planning committee agreed it would not be safe for workers at the firm's depot to have a turbine nearby.

The committee made their decision after hearing protests from angry residents and Brian Skidwell, from the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), who said he was afraid the turbine could one day break.

He said: "My greatest concern is public safety. Turbine accidents are becoming more and more common and ones of this size are normally put in remote locations where an accident is unlikely to harm people.

"An accident on this site however, would have dire consequences."

He was backed by Great Houghton resident Martin Plant, who argued the turbine would also be a blot on the landscape.

He said: "This turbine will be a huge structure. It's like a jumbo jet rotating on the end of a pole and it will utterly dominate the town for years to come."

But ASDA's Mark Hawkin said steps could be taken to make sure the turbine was safe.

He said he was also happy with his employees working under it, adding: "This turbine would be an iconic statement of Northampton's willingness to tackle a global problem.

"And people can work underneath one of these turbines, I've no issue with that at all, nor has ASDA."

But his argument was not accepted by planning committee members who voted three to one to refuse the plan.

Committee member, Councillor Penny Flavell (Con, St Crispin) said: "All along I've had great concerns about this. Yes, we do have to consider the planet, but in my opinion this is going a step too far.

"I think saving energy is being put before the safety of residents."

The committee's decision to block the development will be ratified at its next meeting on September 2.

The full article contains 387 words and appears in Northampton Chron & Echo newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 July 2008 10:35 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Rob@Home,

Northampton 30/07/2008 12:00:22
Of course it is silly to have these turbines near people.

Afterall, we are hearing of these turbines breaking and falling apart at least once a week, and the death toll globally of people killed because of industrial wind turbines is out ragous.

2

Willfromthornby,

30/07/2008 12:30:00
wow I had never really considered the danger of turbines before, I have always been more concerned with how they impact on the countryside. For what it is worth I really do think they are such a scar on our landscape and I hate they way they usually stick out like a sore thumb! why not build all of them out to sea?

Great Houghton is a charming village and I am glad it the residents will not have to put up with it. The decision on these schemes shlould always lay in the hands of local residents - the ones who have to put up with them every day!

Lets hope that the Naseby wind scheme is the next to be scrapped as that really is outrageous!
3

Willfromthornby,

30/07/2008 12:33:37
wow I had never really considered the danger of turbines before, I have always been more concerned with how they impact on the countryside. For what it is worth I really do think they are such a scar on our landscape and I hate they way they usually stick out like a sore thumb! why not build all of them out to sea?

Great Houghton is a charming village and I am glad the residents will not have to put up with it. The decision on these schemes should always lay in the hands of local residents - the ones who have to put up with them every day!

Lets hope that the Naseby wind scheme is the next to be scrapped as that really is outrageous!
4

Des Borough,

30/07/2008 12:36:20
I'd rather not live underneath one thank you very much!!!

http://www.responsiblewind.org/docs/wind_turbine_accidents_in_pictures.pdf

I live within site of the Burton Wolds site at Burton Latimer and I don't think they are a blot on the landscape, on the contrary, I think they are a fantastic feature.........just at a distance and not above me!!
5

Roger Mellie,

30/07/2008 14:06:50
Why is it silly to have turbines near people? I'd far rather they were cluttering up the skyline of the people who are consuming the electricity, rather than ruining the rural landscape.

The day the residents stop watching TV, using fridges and cooking is the day they can have a valid moral objection.
6

Jamie0S,

Northampton 30/07/2008 14:46:50
Now I know this reporter was at the meeting, because I spoke to him. But why has he failed to report on the events of the evening?

Brian Binley storming in and demanding to speak seems an important part of the story to me. The CPRE man saying his comments on the proposal had been edited to make it sound more favourable would too. And all the complaints about the undemocratic nature of the WNDC etc seem to have been erased from events.

And why not explain why the single vote for was made (a WNDC man who said he trusts the planning officials totally and if they said yes he couldn't disagree). He said that on every application, and does so at every meeting. He's paid to be there by us.

Name him, and the planning officers who suggested the application should be passed.

The reporter is supposed to write a report of the events of the evening not the minutes of the meeting.

When are the Chronicle and Echo going to start investigating the WNDC and follow up on every mess they're involved in? They happen quite regularly.
You're looking like their poodles, pull your finger out and report the news.
7

climate worrier,

Bozeat 31/07/2008 00:00:27
The WNDC planners seemed so determined to have a monument to their green credentials that they simply refused to listen to any criticism of this turbine. They bent over backwards to waive safety distances arguing that they were not listed as mandatory. Not even the turbine manufacturer's own manual seemed to carry any weight with them.

In a world where children are not allowed to play conkers in case they get hurt, it looked as if attaching a green label was all that it took to throw health and safety concerns to the wind.

Thank goodness the planning committee were not so blinkered.

This site was never suitable for an industrial scale turbine, but with annual profits of around £250,000 a year for almost no effort it, is easy to understand how ASDA may have lost sight of its duty of care to their workers.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.