Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 18th March 2010

'Why did warehouse not have sprinklers?'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 October 2008
Millions of pounds of damage and workforce redundancies would not have happened if the Northampton warehouse destroyed by fire had sprinklers fitted, the fire service has said.
The first charred and blackened sections of the Garrard Waters factory in Caswell Road, Brackmills, were pulled down by contractors yesterday, after fire tore through the 60,000 sq ft warehouse last week.

The property was not fitted with sprinklers, which would have prevented the blaze taking hold.

Luke Hodson, fire protection group manager at Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service, said: "There has been millions of pounds of damage, about 35 people could lose their jobs, an industry for Northampton is now gone, and thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money has been spent fighting the fire.

"This building has been destroyed by fire, but had there been a sprinkler system fitted it would been a small fire, the size of a car fire. A crew would have extinguished the fire then left the scene and the business would have and stayed up and running.

"For a new building here, the sprinkler system would be one to three per cent of the total building costs. In more than 95 per cent of fires worldwide where a sprinkler system is fitted buildings survive the fire.

"It's quite alarming that we are still having these fires."

Mr Hodson added: "What is really annoying is that buildings of this size are not required by law to be fitted with sprinkler systems. We urge people to consider it."

Tony Brewer, chief executive of the Headlam Group, which Garrard Waters was part of, said he couldn't comment on whether sprinklers would have stopped the fire.

But he said: "Fire regulations within Northamptonshire don't require sprinklers within a building of the size of Garrard Waters. The fire service were on-site pretty quickly and were damping down the fire."

Mr Brewer said the company had decided to demolish the building.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 October 2008 8:13 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

robert angus,

04/10/2008 10:02:47
The insurance companies have the power by not giving fire insurance unless sprinklers are fitted or increase the insurance at unafordale levels.
2

Countessa,

Duston 06/10/2008 07:03:50
This is down to our local authority, who do not insist on sprinkler systems as part of planning regulations.

It's about time they thought about the dangers faced by our fire fighters, the cost of fighting this fire, along with the economic costs of this business closing down and jobs being lost.

Other local authorities have sprinklers as a requirement of new buildings. Why don't we? Someone at the council needs to urgently review their stance on this.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.