Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Our voices don't count over mast' say Kingsthorpe campaigners

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 December 2008
Campaigners who fought to stop a fourth mobile phone mast being installed near their Northampton homes say their voices simply do not count after O2 won the battle.
The bid to put up the 12.5m monopole on land adjacent to Welford Road, Kingsthorpe, was originally turned down by Northampton Borough Council in June.

But O2 appealed and an independent planning inspectorate in Bristol overturned the decision.

Irene Rose, aged 76, of Larwood Close, off Welford Road, spearheaded the campaign and helped present a 65-signature petition to the borough council. She said: "I feel the general public don't count; our opinions on all sorts of things are just brushed aside.

"O2 had looked at privately-owned land and the landowners said 'no'. Well, Northampton Borough Council is a landowner, and we pay our council tax to be part of that."

Mrs Rose said nearby residents were opposed to the monopole because they were concerned about the health implications and the visual pollution of the area.

She said: "There is not enough proof to say that there is no danger to health. We have got the local playgroup nearby and the fields near it are used for sport.

In the report on his decision, planning inspector Ian Radcliffe wrote: "The appearance of the street scene in the vicinity of the appeal site is that of an active residential area with pedestrian islands, railings, bus stops and street lighting. The three existing telecom poles add to the street furniture.

"There is nothing to indicate that there would be an actual risk to health."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 December 2008 8:50 PM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
Prev
1
Next
1

J Elliott,

12/12/2008 12:06:06
Planning Inspector Ian Radcliffe has contemptuously dismissed the serious health concerns expressed by local residents. On the contrary Mr Radcliffe over 2000 independent studies, linking phone mast electro magnetic radiation with serious ill health including cancer, confirm that phone masts should not be sited within 350 metres of schools or housing. Numerous studies have proved that melatonin, the cancer fighting hormone, is suppressed by this pulsing radiation. That's why the cancer clusters continue to increase in the vicinity of phone masts. Phone operators dismiss such research, alleging that their own studies suggest no health risk. However last year the national press revealed that a phone operator covered up the damaging results of their own research. The Ecolog Institute, a research organisation which examines the health effects of mobile phones, was commissioned to investigate the possible health risks of mobile phone masts. The 2003 Ecolog report confirmed:

'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'

Mr Radcliffe obviously thinks this is nothing. He deserves our utter contempt.

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.