Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Northampton Chron & Echo site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'318 years' to pay fraud money back



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 September 2007
A father-of-four who claimed £34,363 incapacity benefit while pretending to be unable to work, could take more than 300 years to repay the money.
Richard Curran, 50, was jailed for 18 months at Northampton Crown Court for falsely obtaining benefits while claiming to be unable to work or stand for long periods, due to sciatica.

Richard Dewsbery, prosecuting for the Department of Work and Pen
sions, said Curran applied for incapacity benefit in September 1997. He claimed he was unable to work due to severe lower back pain.

In August 2005, he provided documents which stated he had difficulty standing unless supported, could not sit comfortably for more than 10 minutes and needed to use a walking stick.

However, from 2001 he was employed by a company which installs conveyor belt systems across the UK and was being paid between £19,000 and £28,000 a year.

By October last year, his bogus claim for incapacity benefit had been brought to the attention of fraud investigators.

Mr Dewsbery said: "He has now entered into an agreement to pay back the money at £9 a month and, by my estimation, Your Honour, that will take something like 318 years."

Passing sentence, Judge Richard Bray described it as "a bad case of really blatant fraud".

Curran, of High Street, Hardingstone, admitted to magistrates last month to three offences of failing to declare a change in circumstances while claiming benefits.

Richard Holloway, defending, said Curran had struggled to provide for his family at a difficult time in his marriage.

He said: "He could not complain about a custodial sentence, but he knows he has brought this upon himself."



The full article contains 284 words and appears in Northampton Chron & Echo newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 September 2007 9:56 AM
  • Source: Northampton Chron & Echo
  • Location: Northampton
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.